Compare Map Projections

Deutsch  •  English
—
[info]    Viewing options:      

My Projection Collection:
Compare Projections

Wagner-Denoyer I vs. Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216

Projection Selection

Select two projections:

Projection No. 1:

Projection No. 2:

Mode:    [ Info ]

 

Or:

→ Selection by thumbnail
→ Select from list

Projection Informations
  Wagner-Denoyer I Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Creator Tobias Jung (2016) Karlheinz Wagner, Tobias Jung (1941 / 2018)
Group Miscellaneous Lenticular
Property Compromise Equal-area
Other Names — —
Remarks My own attempt at map projections.
It is a mix of Wagner VII and Denoyer Semi-elliptical, with a weight of 60% at Denoyer.
Generated with Flex Projector.
See the article on Wagner-Denoyer.		 Wagner VII variant, compromise projection, configuration 73-46-60-14-206 (using the Böhm notation, see Umbeziffern – The Wagner Transformation Method.

Experimental, generated to approach my other experiment, the Wagner-Denoyer I, but being equal-area.
recommended comparisons Denoyer Semi-Elliptical
Wagner VII
Wagner-Denoyer II
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Wagner vii@73-46-60-14-206		 Wagner-Denoyer I
This pairing is among the list of recommended pairings – but why?
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 is supposed to approach the Wagner-Denoyer I (but maintaining equivalence).

1. Comparison: Physical Map – scaled to fit

Wagner-Denoyer I
Wagner-Denoyer I
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Wagner-Denoyer I c Tobias Jung     Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 c Tobias Jung

2. Comparison: Political Map – scaled to fit

Wagner-Denoyer I
Wagner-Denoyer I
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Wagner-Denoyer I c Tobias Jung     Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 c Tobias Jung

3. Comparison: Silhouette Map – scaled to fit

Click on projection’s name to hide it
Grey areas: Superimposition of projections
Wagner-Denoyer I Silhouette Map
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Silhouette Map
Wagner-Denoyer I Silhouette Map c Tobias Jung     Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Silhouette Map c Tobias Jung

4. Comparison: Tissot Indicatrix, 30° – scaled to fit

Wagner-Denoyer I
Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix
Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix c Tobias Jung     Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix c Tobias Jung

5. Comparison: Physical Map – scaled to same width

Wagner-Denoyer I
Wagner-Denoyer I
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Wagner-Denoyer I c Tobias Jung     Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 c Tobias Jung

6. Comparison: Political Map – scaled to same width

Wagner-Denoyer I
Wagner-Denoyer I
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Wagner-Denoyer I c Tobias Jung     Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 c Tobias Jung

7. Comparison: Silhouette Map – scaled to same width

Click on projection’s name to hide it
Grey areas: Superimposition of projections
Wagner-Denoyer I Silhouette Map
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Silhouette Map
Wagner-Denoyer I Silhouette Map c Tobias Jung     Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Silhouette Map c Tobias Jung

8. Comparison: Tissot Indicatrix, 30° – scaled to same width

Wagner-Denoyer I
Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix
Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix c Tobias Jung     Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix c Tobias Jung

9. Comparison: Tissot Indicatrix, 15° – scaled to fit

Wagner-Denoyer I
Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix
Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix c Tobias Jung     Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix c Tobias Jung

10. Comparison: Tissot Indicatrix, 15° – scaled to same width

Wagner-Denoyer I
Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216
Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix
Wagner-Denoyer I Tissot Indicatrix c Tobias Jung     Wagner vii@70-46-60-0-216 Tissot Indicatrix c Tobias Jung
 

Go to top