Feedback
For comments, questions, suggestions and criticism of any kind, write an email to:
… OR:
Leave a comment on this site
Some pages (e.g. the articles about Basic Knowledge or Selected Projections)
offer a commentary function for comments regarding the subject in question.
For general comments regarding the website map-projections.net, use the comment form below:
Comments
24 comments
There are further comments in the german version.
Some bored bastard takes pleasure in dumping a whole load of comment spam here every now and then.
As I currently have neither the time nor the inclination to deal with it,
comments are not permitted at the moment.
I’ll look into this situation soon; and I reckon it’ll end up with comments being moderated …
Sorry!
Andreas Skyman
HumanImprint
Tobias Jung
Yes, that’s confusing, but these dates are correct.
Wagner published the projections that are nowadays (he himself didn’t use those numbers) called Wagner I and Wagner III in a paper that was published in 1932. Then, in 1949, he published the book »Kartographische Netzentwürfe«, in which he again presented some of the projections he had developed earlier, along with some new ones.
The ordinal numbers were added later (to my knowledge, by John P. Snyder), using the order in which they are shown in the 1949 book.
And since Wagner went from the equal-area projection, to the projection with some amount of areal distortion, to the one with equally spaced parallels, they are now called Wagner I, II, and III, although they were originally published in a different chronological order.
Nathan
Tobias Jung
Yes, I know the Waterman butterfly, and I’d love to add it to the website, but no software that I use is able to generate it. Thus, I can’t create the images that I use for all the other projections.
At some point in the future, I’m going to add a post to the blog, listing »the missing projections« that I’m not showing yet for this reasons. It’ll include the Waterman as well as the Dymaxion, Cahill-Keyes, Authagraph…
Peter Weenink
Thanks for your informative projection website! I'm working on Mapvision, a GEO-portal with international info about carto/geo/topo/hydrography, and much more global geo-related info. Sometime this year I will put a link to your site at: http://www.mapvision.eu/node/m…
Best regards, Peter.
Roland
Robin
In that vein... This is a very useful website, but from a professional standpoint, it would help if there more citations to sources, esp. for some of the more esoteric projections.
Tobias Jung
It was made using Flex Projector, I grabbed it from the gallery of that application:
http://flexprojector.com/galle…
I don’t know how it was mixed exactly, since FP offers a few options.
About the sources and citations: Good point!
I’m going to add more information, but I’ll do it bit by bit as time goes by.
Thank you for you comment and suggestion!
Clinton
Great website! Quick question... what is meant by 'compromise', under the property column - for some projections?
Thanks
Tobias Jung
thank you! :-)
Quick answer: The term „compromise“ refers to projection that is neither equal-area, nor conformal or equidistant.
For more information about these properties, see:
https://map-projections.net/pr…
Hope this helps!
Rick
Liam
Tobias Jung
Jean Gardner
I found my way to your very informative website because I am interested in Bucky Fuller's Dymaxion Map. I am wondering if you know of any digital developments of this map that allow for folding and other manipulations to reveal relationships not otherwise evident.
Please respond even if you don't know. That way I will know you received you question.
Much Thanks, Jean Gardner
Weia Reinboud
Nice site of you, I know it. I am not a cartographer too!
Greetz, Weia
Alexandre Canana
Stefan Korf
I have a question, I could find out how it works, I read the papers but I am no good at either math and coding.
I have a map of a world from the german micro/virtual nations and it's in wagner VII and I would really love to get my hands on a merkator projection to put it on a globe/3D object.
It's a vectorgraphic but I am just unable to get it to work, or even how to start.
I.E.: How to get something like this: https://map-projections.net/d3…
Actually, doesn't need to be interactive at all.
Alexandre Canana
Henrique Koehler
Mike Elstermann, the #geoObserver
Today in the #geoObserver, see: https://geoobserver.wordpress.…
Alexandre Canana
Tobias Jung
The time I can put into the site is limited, and about a bunch of projections, I know next to nothing.
Alexandre Canana
Alexandre Canana
Ryan Air
Tobias Jung
And yes, this IS a passion project, and I wish I could devote more time to it.
Jennifer DuFault
Chris
I understand that there is no such thing as a perfect 2D projection of a sphere, but perhaps it will be useful to find out which are Pareto-optimal: projections which are not strictly inferior to any other projection, based on some metrics.
My suggestion is to compute the error metrics for each map as suggested by Goldberg and Gott (https://www.physics.drexel.edu/~goldberg/projections/goldberg_gott.pdf): Isotropy, Area, Flexion, Skewness, Distances, and Boundary Cuts. Then determine which maps are Pareto-optimal and which are not. The paper computes those errors for some map projections, and as an example, in their list of 27 maps, 7 are not Pareto-optimal: Eckert VI, Gall-Peters, Hammer, Lambert Conic, Mercator, Mollweide, and Sinusoidal (if I did not make any mistakes).
What do you think?
Tobias Jung
I’d really like to have results of distortion metrics on my website – not necessarily Goldberg & Gott’s, there are a lot of metrics, some of them listed by daan Strebe in a posting in the mapthematics forum (https://www.mapthematics.com/forums/viewtopic.php?p=2440#p2440). But the problem is that this would be a HUGE amount of work – and even then, the values couldn’t be given for ALL listed projections because not all a generated by a formula.
So while I like the idea, it probably won’t happen. :-/
Anonymous
Kevin
Can You Take a Photo of a Map and Project on Different Layout?
Thanks,
Kevin
Tobias Jung
Yes, in principle, this is possible, but
– you have to know what’s the source projection;
– both projections must be available in the software Geocart (should also work, in some cases, with d3 scripts);
– and of course, the source projection image should be in a high resolution to get a decent result.
Also note, if there are labels on the map, they will be projected, too. See an example of a reprojected world map here:
https://blog.map-projections.n…
Madeleine
Tobias Jung
I mentioned this in the blog post when I announced the political map images
https://blog.map-projections.n…
– but you’re right, that information should appear in the image description. I’ll add that sometime (hopefully) soon. Thanks for pointing me there!
Robert
I really like your alternate waterman projection, I would like to print a version of it to put up on my wall using a nice printer/ print shop, so I was wondering if you have any larger file size versions on a white background, and if you did would you be willing to sell that file to me?
Anne
EgeeMonique
Out of curiosity, I would be interested to see a map with some standard projection (e.g. Natural Earth) where the latitude & longitude are inverted, i.e. the great circle passing by longitudes 0 & 180 (or -30 & 150) is now projected where the equator usually appears. That way the both poles would appear where we're used to look at the equator.
Tobias Jung
do you mean something like this?
https://map-projections.net/ma…
Notes:
a) This is not the Equal Earth projection, but – as you can seee – Wagner VII, using a configuration that is close enough for a demo.
b) I just noticed that on the page that I link to, there is a bug when you try to share a configuration where you’ve changed the "Projection Center/Tilt" settings. I’m going to fix this soon (but not today).

Tobias Jung
Hope you keep enjoying the site, and whenever you’ve got any suggestions, feel free to contact me!