My Projection Collection:
Compare Projections
Ciric I vs. Winkel Tripel
| Ciric I | Winkel Tripel | |
|---|---|---|
| Creator | Strahinja Ciric (2010) | Oswald Winkel (1921) |
| Group | Lenticular | Lenticular |
| Property | Compromise | Compromise |
| Other Names | — |
|
| Remarks | The Ciric I projection is based on the Winkel-Tripel and optimized for 54 degrees of acceptable angular distortion and 150% acceptable areal distortion, with parallel bending increasing linearly with latitude, and with equally-distributed meridians. (Quoted from the Flex Projector Gallery) |
— |
| recommended comparisons | A4 Projection Dedistort Winkel Tripel |
Ciric I Natural Earth II Wagner IX.i Winkel Tripel Bartholomew Winkel Tripel BOPC |
|
This pairing is among the list of recommended pairings – but why? Ciric I is based on the Winkel-Tripel. |
||
1. Comparison: Physical Map – scaled to fit
Ciric I
Winkel Tripel
2. Comparison: Political Map – scaled to fit
Ciric I
Winkel Tripel
3. Comparison: Silhouette Map – scaled to fit
4. Comparison: Tissot Indicatrix, 30° – scaled to fit
Ciric I
Winkel Tripel
5. Comparison: Physical Map – scaled to same width
Ciric I
Winkel Tripel
6. Comparison: Political Map – scaled to same width
Ciric I
Winkel Tripel
7. Comparison: Silhouette Map – scaled to same width
8. Comparison: Tissot Indicatrix, 30° – scaled to same width
Ciric I
Winkel Tripel
9. Comparison: Tissot Indicatrix, 15° – scaled to fit
Ciric I
Winkel Tripel
10. Comparison: Tissot Indicatrix, 15° – scaled to same width
Ciric I
Winkel Tripel
